Subject(s)
Gastrectomy , Gastritis, Hypertrophic/pathology , Gastroscopy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pyloric Antrum/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antibiotics may be particularly high in parts of the tropics. Infection may prove difficult to eradicate in such situations, and there is some evidence of benefit in increasing the duration of treatment (triple therapy) from 1 week to 2 or 3 weeks. AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of 1 week versus 2 weeks of triple therapy for eradication of H. pylori in a Sri Lankan population. METHODS: Eighty two patients aged 18-70 years with gastritis or peptic ulcer and testing positive for H. pylori infection were randomly allocated to two treatment groups. Both groups received omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg, and tinidazole 500 mg. Group A (n = 42) received the trial medication twice daily for 1 week and the Group B (n = 40) twice daily for 2 weeks. H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative 14C labelled urea breath test at 2 weeks after completion of the therapy. RESULTS: H. pylori infection was eradicated in 36 (85.7%) patients in Group A and 36 (90%) patients in Group B (p = 0.9). Twenty three (55%) patients in Group A and 17 (43%) in Group B reported adverse effects attributable to trial medication (p = 0.387); none were serious. Three (7.5%) patients in Group B discontinued treatment due to adverse events that developed on days 7, 9 and 10. CONCLUSION: Twice daily treatment with clarithromycin, tinidazole, and omeprazole for 1 week is well tolerated and provides as good a rate of H. pylori eradication as 2-week therapy in Sri Lankan patients.
Subject(s)
Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Clarithromycin/administration & dosage , Confidence Intervals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Helicobacter pylori/drug effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Probability , Risk Assessment , Sri Lanka , Tinidazole/administration & dosage , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To study the safety of low dose subcutaneous adrenaline given as prophylaxis against acute adverse reactions to anti-venom serum (AVS) in patients bitten by snakes. METHODS: Patients admitted with snakebite envenoming who satisfied inclusion criteria were given 0.25 ml of 1:1000 adrenaline subcutaneously immediately before administration of AVS. They were observed for adverse effects, and pulse and blood pressure (BP) were monitored. RESULTS: 51 patients [35 males, mean age 34.8 years (SD 14)] were included in the study. Adverse reactions to AVS occurred in 15 (29.4%) patients. There was one death from suspected cerebral haemorrhage, and 3 (5.9%) patients developed small haematomas at the subcutaneous injection site. There were no significant changes in mean pulse or BP following administration of subcutaneous adrenaline. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose subcutaneous adrenaline did not cause significant changes in pulse rate or BP. Although the death was unlikely to be directly related to subcutaneous adrenaline, we suggest further studies on the safety of this prophylactic treatment before its routine use.